Leo E. Strine, Jr.
Honorable Walter K. Stapleton, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 1989-1990
Honorable John F. Gerry, United States District Court, District of New Jersey, 1988-1989
Leo E. Strine, Jr.
Leo E. Strine, Jr., is Of Counsel in the Corporate Department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. Prior to joining the firm, he was the Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court from early 2014 through late 2019. Before becoming the Chief Justice, he had served on the Delaware Court of Chancery as Chancellor since June 22, 2011, and as a Vice Chancellor since November 9, 1998.
In his judicial positions, Mr. Strine wrote hundreds of opinions in the areas of corporate law, contract law, trusts and estates, criminal law, administrative law, and constitutional law. Notably, he authored the lead decision in the Delaware Supreme Court case holding that Delaware’s death penalty statute was unconstitutional because it did not require the key findings necessary to impose a death sentence to be made by a unanimous jury.
Mr. Strine holds long-standing teaching positions at Harvard and University of Pennsylvania, where he has and continues to teach diverse classes in corporate law addressing, among other topics, mergers and acquisitions, the role of independent directors, valuation, and corporate law theories. He is a member of the American Law Institute, and currently serves as an advisor on the project to create a restatement of corporate law.
Mr. Strine also serves as the Michael L. Wachter Distinguished Fellow in Law and Policy at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, the Ira M. Millstein Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Ira M. Millstein Center for Global Markets and Corporate Ownership at Columbia Law School and a Senior Fellow of the Harvard Program on Corporate Governance. From 2006 to 2019, Mr. Strine served as the special judicial consultant to the ABA’s Committee on Corporate Laws. He also was the special judicial consultant to the ABA’s Committee on Mergers & Acquisitions from 2014 to 2019.
Mr. Strine speaks and writes frequently on the subjects of corporate and public law, and particularly the impact of business on society, and his articles have been published in The University of Chicago Law Review, Columbia Law Review, Cornell Law Review, Duke Law Journal, Harvard Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, and Stanford Law Review, among others. On several occasions, his articles were selected as among the Best Corporate and Securities Articles of the year, based on the choices of law professors.
Before becoming a judge in 1998, Strine served as Counsel and Policy Director to Governor Thomas R. Carper, and had also worked as a corporate litigator at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom from 1990 to 1992. He was law clerk to Judge Walter K. Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and Chief Judge John F. Gerry of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Mr. Strine graduated magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1988, and was a member of the Order of the Coif. In 1985, he received his Bachelor’s Degree summa cum laude from the University of Delaware and was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and a Truman Scholar.
In 2000, Governor Carper awarded Mr. Strine the Order of the First State. In 2002, President David Roselle of the University of Delaware presented him with the University’s Presidential Citation for Outstanding Achievement. In 2006, he was selected as a Henry Crown Fellow at the Aspen Institute. In 2019, he was awarded an honorary degree from Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland.
Mr. Strine lives in Hockessin, Delaware with his wife Carrie, who is an occupational therapist at the DuPont Hospital for Children, and his two sons, James and Benjamin.
- Caremark And ESG, Perfect Together: A Practical Approach To Implementing An Integrated, Efficient, And Effective Caremark And EESG Strategy,
in John M. Olin Center For Law, Economics, and Business Discussion Paper No. 1037. Available on The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. This paper is also available as Discussion Paper 2020-4 of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance and on Columbia Law School’s Blog on Corporations and the Capital Markets, August 3, 2020.
- Toward Fair Gainsharing and a Quality Workplace For Employees: How a Reconceived Compensation Committee Might Help Make Corporations More Responsible Employers and Restore Faith in American Capitalism,
in Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper No. 1035 and U of Pennsylvania, Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 20-37. FORTHCOMING in The Business Lawyer (Winter 2020-2021).
- Development on a Cracked Foundation: How the Incomplete Nature of New Deal Labor Reform Presaged Its Ultimate Decline: A Response to Cueller, Levi, and Weingast,
in 57 Harv. J. on Leg. 67 (2020).
- Fiduciary Blind Spot: The Failure of Institutional Investors to Prevent the Illegitimate Use of Working Americans' Savings for Corporate Political Spending,
in The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series: No. 1022, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3304611 and 97 Wash. U. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2019).
- "Citizens United" as Bad Corporate Law,
in 2019 Wis. L. Rev. 451.
- Made for this Moment: The Enduring Relevance of Adolf Berle's Belief in a Global New Deal,
in 42 Seattle U.L. Rev. 267 (2019).
- Fiduciary Principles and Delaware Corporation Law: Searching for the Optimal Balance by Understanding that the World is Not,
in Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law (2018).
- Delaware's Constitutional Mirror Test: Our Moral Obligation to Make the Promise of Equality Real: A Reflection on the Resegregation of Our Schools,
in 17 Del. L. Rev. 97 (2018).
- Perfectly Frank: A Reflection on Quality Lawyering in Honor of R. Franklin Balotti,
in 72 Bus. Law. 603 (2017).
- Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose I: Evidence from My Hometown,
in 33 Oxford Rev. Econ. Pol’y 176 (2017).
- Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose II: An Encouragement for Future Consideration from Professors Johnson and Millon,
in 74 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1165 (2017).
- Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite?: A Flesh and Blood Perspective On Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System,
in 126 Yale L.J. 1870 (2017).
- Corporate Power Ratchet: The Court's Role in Eroding "We The People's" Ability to Constrain Our Corporate Creations,
in 51 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 423 (2016).
- Criminal Justice and (a) Catholic Conscience,
in 56 Santa Clara L. R. 631 (2016).
- Lessons for Luxembourg: Are Delaware and the Netherlands Examples You Can Emulate?,
Cent Ans De Droit Luxembourgeois Des Societies (A Century of Luxembourg Company Law) 375 (2016).
- Originalist or Original: The Difficulties of Reconciling "Citizens United" with Corporate Law History,
in 91 Notre Dame L. Rev. 877 (2016).
- Securing Our Nation's Economic Future: A Sensible, Nonpartisan Agenda to Increase Long-Term Investment and Job Creation in The United States,
71 Bus. Law. 1081 (2016).
- The Siren Song of Unlimited Contractual Freedom,
in Research Handbook on Partnerships, LLCs, and Alternative Forms of Business Organizations (2015).
- The Soviet Constitution Problem in Comparative Corporate Law: Testing the Proposition that European Corporate Law is More Stockholder-Focused Than U.S. Corporate Law,
in 89 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1239 (2016).
- A Job Is Not a Hobby: The Judicial Revival of Corporate Paternalism and Its Problematic Implications,
in 41 J. Corp. L. 71 (2015).
- The Dangers of Denial: The Need for a Clear-Eyed Understanding of the Power and Accountability Structure Established by the Delaware General Corporation Law,
in 50 Wake Forest L. Rev. 761 (2015).
- Documenting the Deal: How Quality Control and Candor Can Improve Boardroom Decisionmaking And Reduce the Litigation Target Zone.,
in 70 Bus. Law. 679 (2015).
- Conservative Collision Course?: The Tension between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and "Citizens United",
in 100 Cornell L. Rev. 335 (2015).
- Making It Easier for Directors To "Do the Right Thing"?,
in 4 Harv. Bus. L. Rev. 235 (2014).
- Can We Do Better By Ordinary Investors? A Pragmatic Reaction To The Dueling Ideological Mythologists of Corporate Law,
in 114 Colum. L. Rev. 449 (2014).
- Putting Stockholders First, Not the First-Filed Complaint,
in 69 Bus. Law. 1 (2013).
- Poor Pitiful or Potently Powerful Preferred?,
in 161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2025 (2013).
- "Old School" Law School's Continuing Relevance for Business Lawyers in the New Global Economy: How a Renewed Commitment to Old School Rigor and the Law as a Professional and Academic Discipline Can Produce Better Lawyers,,
in 17 Chapman L. Rev. 137 (2013).
- Our Continuing Struggle with the Idea That For-Profit Corporations Seek Profit,
in 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. (2012).
- Delaware Corporate Law and the Model Business Corporation Act: A Study in Symbiosis,
in 74 Law and Contemp. Probs. 107 (Winter 2011).
- The Role of Delaware In The American Corporate Governance System, And Some Preliminary Musings On The Meltdown's Implications for Corporate Law,
in Corporate Governance: Current Issues and the Financial Crisis 67 (Wilco Oostwouder & Hans Schenk eds., 2011) (written and presented in final form at the Governance of the Modern Firm Conference (Dec. 13, 2008)).
- One Fundamental Corporate Governance Question We Face: Can Corporations Be Managed for the Long Term Unless Their Powerful Electorates Also Act and Think Long Term?,
in 66 Bus. Law. 1 (2010).
- Loyalty's Core Demand: The Defining Role of Good Faith in Corporation Law,
in 98 Geo. L.J 629 (2010).
- The Story of "Blasius Industries v. Atlas Corp.": Keeping The Electoral Path To Takeovers Clear,
in Corporate Law Stories, Chapter 9 (2009).
- Breaking the Corporate Governance Logjam in Washington: Some Constructive Thoughts on a Responsible Path Forward,
in 63 Bus. Law. 1079 (2008).
- Human Freedom and Two Friedmen: Musings on the Implications of Globalization for the Effective Regulation of Corporate Behavior,
in 58 U. Toronto L.J. 241 (2008).
- Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance,
in 33 J. Corp. L. 1 (2007).
- Toward a True Corporate Republic: A Traditionalist Response to Bebchuk's Solution for Improving Corporate America,
in 119 Harv. L. Rev. 1759 (2006).
- The Delaware Way: How We Do Corporate Law and Some of the New Challenges We (and Europe) Face,
in 30 Del. J. Corp. L. 673 (2005).
- When the Existing Economic Order Deserves a Champion: The Enduring Relevance of Martin Lipton’s Vision of the Corporate Law,
in 60 Bus. Law. 383 (2005).
- If Corporate Action Is Lawful, Presumably There Are Circumstances in Which It Is Equitable to Take That Action: The Implicit Corollary to the Rule of Schnell v. Chris-Craft,
in 60 Bus. Law 877 (2005).
- Warning – Potential Danger Ahead! A Business Judge's Starting List of Yellow Flags for the Conscientious Independent Director,
in Directors & Boards, Third Quarter 2004.
- The New Federalism Of The American Corporate Governance System: Preliminary Reflections Of Two Residents Of One Small State,
in 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 953 (2003).
- "Mediation Only" Filings in the Delaware Court of Chancery: Can New Value Be Added by One of America's Business Courts?,
in 53 Duke L.J. 585 (2003).
- Judge "The Game by the Rules": An Appreciation of the Judicial Philosophy and Method of Walter K. Stapleton,
in 6 Del. L. Rev. 223 (2003).
- Should I Serve? Useful Considerations for Prospective Directors Deciding Whether to Join a Board and Incumbents Pondering Whether to Continue,
in Corporate Governance Advisor, Volume 11 Number 1, January/February 2003.
- The Professorial Bear Hug: The ESB Proposal as a Conscious Effort to Make the Delaware Courts Confront the Basic "Just Say No" Question,
in 55 Stan. L. Rev. 863 (2002).
- Derivative Impact? Some Early Reflections on the Corporation Law Implications of the Enron Debacle,
in 57 Bus. Law. 1371 (2002).
- The Social Responsibility Of Boards Of Directors And Stockholders In Change Of Control Transactions: Is There Any “There” There?,
in 75 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1169 (2002).
- The Great Takeover Debate: A Meditation on Bridging the Conceptual Divide,
in 69 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1067 (2002).
- Realigning the Standard of Review of Director Due Care With Delaware Public Policy: A Critique of Van Gorkom and It's Progeny as a Standard of Review Problem,
in 96 NW. U. L. REV. 449 (2002).
- The Inescapably Empirical Foundation of the Common Law of Corporations,
in 27 Del. J. Corp. L. 499 (2002).
- Delaware's Corporate-Law System: Is Corporate America Buying an Exquisite Jewel or a Diamond in the Rough--A Response to Kahan & Kamar's Price Discrimination in the Market for Corporate Law,
in 86 Cornell L. Rev. 1257 (2001).
- Function Over Form: A Reassessment of Standards of Review in Delaware Corporation Law,
in 56 Bus. Law. 1287 (2001).
- Categorical Confusion: Deal Protection Measures in Stock-for-Stock Merger Agreements,
in 56 Bus. Law. 919 (2001).
- My Random Observations on Advocating Before the Government,
in 17 Del. Law. 21 (1999).
Select Op Eds
- What Milton Friedman Missed About Social Inequality,
in The New York Times, September 10, 2020.
- Remembering what comes first is more important than ever,
in Financial Times, March 27, 2020.
- Why Excessive Risk-Taking Is Not Unexpected,
in N.Y. Times Dealbook (October 5, 2009).